I.R.S. #6 Ð JUST A FEW WEEKS LEFT!
Filing
in Hz So Good's 6th Annual I.R.S. -
as in "It Really Shoulda" been
a Top 10 hit Ð is down to the final weeks. This year everyone who declares their
I.R.S. songs is a winner thanks to: HardToFindMusicAndMovies.com.
HereÕs all you have to do:
á
Send in your list of songs that
make you say. . ."THAT really shoulda been a Top 10 Hit!" at http://www.musicradio77.com/emailrich.html
or to IRS104@verizon.net.
á
Any song that didn't reach the
Top 10 in the U.S. is fair game, whether or not it was ever on any chart, ever
released as a single or ever released in the U.S.
And it doesn't matter if you
don't know (or care) whether songs were Top 10 or not. We'll take care of all
corrections.
á
It doesn't matter how few or many
songs you send, just not more than 100, please! Unless you specify otherwise,
lists are assumed to be in rank order, title followed by artist. Since this is
a ranking of songs, do not list two sides of a single as one entry.
Likewise,
do not list two or more versions of the same song as one entry.
á
Everyone filing an I.R.S. form
receives a FREE one-year membership to HardToFindMusicAndMovies.com,
including a 20% discount off non-sale items! Remember to include your full name and complete mailing address at the end of
your list
to receive. Plus, a few lucky I.R.S. filers will receive
"refunds" in the form of either merchandise from RadioLogoLand.com or a 4-disc set of the
I.R.S. Top 104 (counting down on tax deadline weekend).
á
Listen for the I.R.S. Top 104
count down on Rewound Radio (the kickoff
on Bob RadilÕs Friday Night 60s-70s Show, 6-10pm ET) and WRNJRadio.com (ÒThe Rest Of The WeekÓ Sat
6am-1pm and Sun 10am-3pm ET) over tax deadline weekend, starting Friday, April
12th.
If weÕre not already
connected, friend me on Facebook (richappel7) or follow me on Twitter
(@RestOfTheWeek) for regular I.R.S. updates.
Preparers are standing by.
H&Z ROCK
a
division of
ÒFighting to
stay freeÓ
#172...March
2013
THEN
NOW
SOON
PREPARING FOR ÒALL-STATIONS-EQUALÓ
RADIO
And now, ladies and gentlemenÉ
Éthe nail-biting has officially begun. Since January 1st I
have never seen so much written about the coming world of
Internet-and-then-some radio in automobiles.
I know, I know, itÕs
already there. Plug in your phone and youÕre good to go. Only thing is,
changing stations while drivingÕs a little tough. But the pre-set universe is
surely on the way.
And then what?
Well, it may not mean much
as far as news-based AM is concerned. Timely information delivered on stations
whose dial positions are ingrained in the brains of long-time listeners will
always have a place in the driving experience. People want to know whatÕs going
on, especially when it might affect them, like when there are weather alerts.
Having a staff to gather and report that news costs money, meaning itÕd be
tough for someone outside of terrestrial radio to make a go of that.
The other key part of AM,
talk, is trickier to call. Some still-popular syndicated hosts like Limbaugh
and Hannity will continue to attract a large listenership, but there are lots
of folks offering off-terrestrial talk shows who will now be able to grow their
shows more easily. Someone like Tom Leykis with an already-huge online
following is a big winner here. Smaller fish who have been doing talk on the
Ônet just for fun will find out just how far the buzz will carry them. I assume
thereÕll be a way to easily program and select podcasts so theyÕll get a boost
as well.
Then thereÕs music-based
entertainment. Had this situation existed even ten years ago, IÕd contend that
broadcast would remain squarely in the driverÕs seat (if you will), because of
the combination of constantly changing newer music and professional edge.
Arguably, FM may no longer have the advantage when it comes to either. Over top
40Õs five-plus decades, the format has ceded the Ònew music leaderÓ image to
others. When it comes to simply playing the hits, anyone from a
mega-group-owned major market powerhouse to a teenager on a computer in his
bedroom can now do it and do it well. For drivers, finding music they enjoy
with minimal interruptions (read, commercials) just got easier. So did finding
DJ-aided music with talent thatÕs allowed to not just talk but entertain: so
many great jocks who were cast off from terrestrial into the Internet wild have
been waiting in the wings to return to our presets.
On the music side, there
are also hundreds, perhaps thousands of specialized programs and formats that
will now get equal footing with everything over the air. Many of those shows
are archived for enjoyment at the listenerÕs discretion, and IÕd have to think
that like podcasts, theyÕd also be easily programmable for in-car listening.
While none of these shows are likely to make the bottom of any page of a
ratings analysis, taken together they could certainly pull shares from the
biggest music stations.
Now letÕs tackle the
biggest question of all from a business standpoint. How will this change impact
how advertisers reach listeners? Sure, existing FMs and AMs will continue to be
the biggest kids on the block, just not as big as they were. The most prominent
Internet-originated services, most of which already have advertising, will get
stronger. What about everyone else? Will agencies find that other
stations/services suddenly showing up on the radar are worth altering a media
plan for? Will Home Depot see the value in basement oldies or any home grown
format that attracts enough of their target demographic?
Clearly, the move by
terrestrialÕs top station owners to create Ônational formatsÕ which are
music-intense and sound the same everywhere is being done in expectation of
Òall-stations-equalÓ radio in automobiles. They want to own these brands before
the online versions of every major format become more widely available to
consumers. From that angle, itÕs probably a smart strategy, but taken together
with all the jockless formats online to become radio user friendly, it begs the
question: Is the listener better served? Do most of us really want more choices
with even less emphasis on not just the human factor but without humans serving
as entertainers and tour guides? Every year research comes out saying two
things that donÕt mix all that well: listeners want DJs that entertain them,
and want more of their favorite music without interruption. Can any music
service from any origin ever satisfy both needs?
I guess weÕre about to
find that out.
Does
Anyone
Remember
Laughter?
During the 1990s, when ÒSeinfeldÓ and ÒFriendsÓ were TV ratings champs,
the good news was they raised the bar for comedy. The bad news was, they raised
it so high that comedy stopped being funny. (Or is it just me?)
With the exception of CBSÕ
sitcoms (such as ÒThe Big Bang TheoryÓ and ÒHow I Met Your MotherÓ), the art
has moved away from Ôlive audienceÕ taping (and recorded laughter) and toward
sometimes unscripted slice-of-life half hours (ÒThe Office,Ó ÒNew GirlÓ) where
you bring your own laughs, if that is thereÕs anything that makes you laugh.
I understand scripted
shows are supposed to reflect the key demo in order to attract advertisers, and
that the art of comedy must continue to evolve as it reflects the changes in
our lives and society. But does that necessarily mean that weÕre not supposed
to laugh as much, especially when it rings true to the point of depressing us?
ThatÕs certainly the deal with HBOÕs comedies, especially the critically adored
ÒGirls.Ó When was the last time a show nominated for an Emmy in the comedy
category had no laughs?
Or is it simply that
putting ÒGirlsÓ in the more sensible drama category gives it less chance of
being nominated? LetÕs be real here. What rule says that if itÕs 30 minutes
itÕs a comedy and if itÕs 60 a drama? Compared to ÒGirls,Ó ÒThe SopranosÓ was
comedy; so much of it really was played for laughs. But no way would it ever
have been considered anything but a drama by the Television Academy.
I canÕt hear anyone
laughing either.
HereÕs how topsy-turvy
things have become. Most of our current laughter-in sitcoms are produced for
kids and tweens (Disney ChannelÕs ÒGood Luck Charlie,Ó NickelodeonÕs ÒWendell
& VinnieÓ) while most of our animated cartoons are produced for adults
(ÒFamily Guy,Ó ÒThe SimpsonsÓ). ThatÕs not to say the cartoons arenÕt funny,
they are. And, in their own way, so are those kid-coms; at least when you
watch, you know what youÕre gonna get.
Which is more than I can
say for the current crop of adult-targeted half-hour comedies, most of which
are too busy being edgy to be funny. Food for thought: maybe the older the
sitcom, the funnier, because life was simpler: all we wanted was to laugh and
lose ourselves in the fun lives of others. Maybe now viewer expectations are
higher: we want to be challenged, and to look in on those whose lives arenÕt
much better, maybe worse, than our own.
This isnÕt to say the
pendulum might not come back around. Maybe better times ahead will inspire
funnier shows. And maybe those shows will be seen somewhere else, like on
YouTube or FunnyOrDie.com. Either wayÉI miss laughing out loud while watching
TV.
And the hitsÉ
ÉTHOSE OTHER HITS, I MEAN And now,
the sports. TheyÕre changing and so are the needs of the fans.
Let me get to the point: from all that
I see, I believe region-based competition is outdated. The finals of any sport
should pit the two proven best teams against each other regardless of what
division, league or part of the country theyÕre in. Especially given that most
players on any team probably donÕt make their homes in the city of the team
theyÕre playing for.
This said, seeing as baseball season is
upon us, I decided to come up with an alternate post- (and regular, as it turns
out) season strategy, seeing as MLB seems to be open to tinkering lately. Here
it is.
á
Shorten the regular playing
season by one series, maybe two. HereÕs whyÉ
á
The 18 teams with the best
win-loss record overall make the cut for the post-season. This gives more teams
something to play for and more fans something to go to games for. The lower
four of those 18 play in two post-season qualifying games, the two winners of
which join MLBÕs version of the Ôsweet 16.Õ
á
Those remaining 16 play each other
in a best-team-vs.-worst best-of-three series during what would have before
been the last weekend of regular season play. More games for TBS, TNT and Fox
to carry.
á
Then, itÕs the same as it is
currently, except which teams play each other among the remaining eight in a
best-of-five series is again based on an overall best-to-worst record ranking
(and other measures, if there are ties, such as division wins), regardless of
league. So this replaces the old league division series.
á
Then, the four teams left
standing play two best-of-seven qualifying series, again who playing who based
on regular series record, best vs. worst. And those two winners face each other
in the World Series.
Why not?
Making the match-up possibilities truly
unlimited at every turn will make for a more exciting post-season. If the
Yankees and Red Sox are indeed the two best teams during a season, why
shouldnÕt they play each other in the World Series? And if this works Ð if fans
go for it, attendance zooms and ratings go up Ð then perhaps the NFL can take a
lesson and do the same. And so on.
LAST, AND PROBABLY LEASTÉ
* ÒThe CHRoniclerÓ in ThursdayÕs Billboard Top 40 Update (subscribe free
at http://www.billboard.biz/newsletters)
* ÒThe Rest Of The WeekÉÓ Saturday 6am-1pm and
Sunday 10am-3pm ET at http://wrnjradio.com/streaming/
* Follow me at http://twitter.com/#!/@Restoftheweek
* Friend me on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/richappel7). While there, if you like the weekend
show, join the group ÒFans of The Rest of the Week with Rich Appel on WRNJÓ (https://www.facebook.com/groups/323136847786834/?fref=ts).
Click.
. . . . .
Past editions of Hz So Good can be seen
at http://www.60s70s.org/HzSoGood