I.R.S. #7 Ð THE HOME STRETCH!
Hz
So GoodÕs 7th Annual I.R.S. (ÒIt Really ShouldaÓ been a top 10 hit!) is down
to the final few weeks before we tabulate this yearÕs Top 104. So again we ask:
what songs "Really Shoulda" been Top 10?
Use the "E-Z Form" at http://www.musicradio77.com/IRS.html
and send your list of songs that make you say:
"IT REALLY SHOULDA been a Top 10 Hit!" by April 1st.
Any song that didn't reach the Top 10 in the U.S. is fair
game -
whether or not it was ever on any chart, ever released as a
single or ever released in the U.S.
And it doesn't matter if you don't know (or care) whether
songs were Top 10 or not - we'll take care of all
corrections.
It also doesn't matter how few or how many songs you send -
just not more than 100, please.
Lists should be in rank order, title followed by
artist, with your #1 at the top. List
only one song per line.
As the I.R.S. Top 104 is a ranking of songs, do not list two
sides of a single,
two or more versions of the same song, or two
or more songs by any artist as one entry on one line.
Only one I.R.S. form is allowed per person.
Random I.R.S. filers will receive ÒrefundsÓ such as
4-disc sets of this year's Top 104, free appraisals from Forever Vinyl and other prizes.
Please include your
full name and complete mailing address at the end of your list to be
eligible for any prizes
(and so we can mention you during the countdown of the Top
104 on Rewound
Radio).
Listen
for the complete countdown of the 7th Annual I.R.S. Top 104
on Rewound Radio starting
Friday April 11th (just before that other IRS deadline).
Check out and join
the I.R.S. group on
Facebook for updates and more details.
Preparers
are standing by.
H&Z ROCK
a division of
ÒFighting to
Stay FreeÓ #182...March 2014
And now, ladies and gentlemenÉ
10 THINGS THAT HAVENÕT BEEN REPLACED
(AND MAYBE
SHOULDNÕT BE)
The Internet Ð and natural evolution of media, entertainment and life in
general - isnÕt all itÕs cracked up to be. Some remnants of our earlier days on
Earth should not only be preserved but embraced either because they were better
than whatÕs came along since, or the more likely situation: nothing has really
replaced them.
Submitted for your
approval, ten examples of this, beginning with the one nearest and dearest to
my heart. Somehow I sense there are a lot more where these came from.
DJS WHO WERE BIGGER THAN
THE MUSIC THEY PLAYED
We hear the word ÒcuratorÓ a lot these
days related to music subscription services, but itÕs hard to top the radio
host when it comes to passion for and recommendation of music. Some reading
this will recall an era when DJs like Scott Muni - whether on top 40, R&B,
country, rock, really any format - served as expert and gatekeeper: if it was
new and worthy of your attention, he or she would play it or it didnÕt matter.
DJs were bigger than the
music in another way that nothing online can replace: they were our friends. We
tuned in to hear them even more than the music. TheyÕd come on before and after
nearly every song not just to talk about what theyÕd played (and not the
artistsÕ personal lives or gossip, but the music itself) but to entertain,
often offering a humorous take on the world around us, and keep us company.
The combination of
recorded musicÕs greater accessibility and radioÕs decision to follow the
consumer toward a music-intense presentation has, perhaps ironically,
de-emphasized the mediumÕs greatest gift: its ability to be personal and,
unlike Pandora et al, deliver more than just music. At the same time it has
made it easier for even those growing up with live personality radio to forget
about the skills involved in being a communicator, skills that have not been
passed down to most of the current generation of air talent. ItÕs ironic that
in an era when people have less personal contact than ever, opting to text or post
in social media, there wouldnÕt be a greater need for DJs to fill that void.
TV VARIETY
Just as radio served to make sense of
music, TV was once proud to be the clearinghouse for all current entertainment.
The variety format brought the best of live performance Ð theater, comedy,
musicians and yes, plate-spinners and puppeteers Ð into every home. While it
can be argued that Entertainment Weekly
does now what The Ed Sullivan Show
did then, reading about whatÕs new and hot is a long way down from seeing and
experiencing at least a slice of whatÕs out there. And while the current
economics of television can be blamed for killing the variety format, itÕs
surprising that no one online has taken the baton and offered a modern-day
weekly review of everything we need to see or know about.
PAID CRITICS
Online writing and reporting has decimated the respect once reserved for
the arts, not only because anyone can write anything but because so many
web-based pop culture sites have become fixated on attention-getting guerilla
tactics such as ÒWhy (currently hot pop act here) SucksÓ stories. As a result,
the idea of paid critics as the go-to arbiters of whatÕs good and bad has
become old hat. After all, if anyone can submit any review for any movie, play
or performer theyÕve seen, or any new single/album theyÕve listened to, what
makes the professional opinion such a big deal? How about this: the best
critics understand (or ought to understand) all the elements contributing to a
great work of art Ð the production, the writing, the backstories of the
performers, etc. Ð more than those of us who donÕt bother or have the time to
break down a movie or album to examine what went into it. And that brings us
toÉ
SISKEL AND EBERT
While thereÕs nothing wrong with having
hundreds of reviews of just-opened movies at the click of a mouse, it doesnÕt
touch entrusting the decision to see or not to see to critics whose passion for
film itself makes for great viewing. During a near 20-year run on television,
Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert were themselves the best advertisement for going to
movies. In the end, it didnÕt matter whether the pair agreed or disagreed (the
latter always better), or liked or hated a film: like the DJs mentioned
earlier, they became bigger than what they discussed every week. Even if I had
no desire (or more realistically, no money) to see movies (such as this time each
year, the calm before the summer storm), Siskel and Ebert were must-see just to
know what was going on at the multiplex. They always made reviewing look easy,
even though it clearly isnÕt. With so many students of film out there, why
another team of critics with the same smarts and chemistry (or lack thereof)
hasnÕt emerged via any video source to help make sense of movies (and for that
matter the Oscars) is a head-scratcher.
SERVICE
Prince said it best in one of his
biggest hits: ÒThis life youÕre on your own.Ó With the possible exception of
Apple, good help isnÕt easy to come by anymore. If youÕve ever tried to Google
information about your specific problem or get answers on any companyÕs help
page, or spent an hour (or entire day) on the phone with Verizon, you
understand. In other words, the modern day equivalents of gas station
attendants who cleaned your windows and checked your oil no questions asked Ð
or closer to the pop culture world, the person in the record store who could
help you find that song or suggest what album your significant other might like
Ð are poor substitutes.
DEDICATED GAME SHOW HOSTS
Just as radio has attempted to ÔborrowÕ
talent from other media hoping name recognition translates to ratings, what few
network game shows are left have done the same. Not to take anything from Drew
Carey, a brilliant comedian who replaced the iconic Bob Barker as host of The Price Is Right several years ago,
but like being a radio DJ (which many game show hosts were at one time) being Ômaster
of ceremoniesÕ is a special talent in and of itself. Beyond Ryan Seacrest and
Carson Daly, is this species extinct?
ANNNOUNCERS
Related to the above, hereÕs another
broadcast type thatÕs fallen off the radar except for the occasional late night
talk sidekick-throwback, such as The
Tonight Show Starring Jimmy FallonÕs Steve Higgins (Steve who?). The
announcer was one of the best things about pre-TV radio to make the move to the
visual medium, even if on the surface that didnÕt make a lot of sense. But they
adapted by being not only the Òidentifying voiceÓ of a show but also by playing
foil to its host, sometimes getting the best lines.
NOT KNOWING WHATÕS IN OUR
FOOD
We may be healthier for all we now know
about whatÕs really in a McDonaldÕs hamburger, but are we happier? Fast food
and chain restaurants Ð and before those, local car hops and burger joints -
may have questionable reputations in this day and age, but they were, at their
peaks, rites of passage and family destinations. Put another way, theyÕve given
us shared experiences as a nation. Granted, weÕre seeing a new wave of burger
and not-so-fast food places, but a lot of that business is take-home, so the
experience of going out to eat for simple American food continues to fade as we
become less united by activities that were once standard fare (as well as by the
rise of vegetarianism, veganism and gluten-free diets).
THE CENTER OF TOWN
Sure, you could still run into your
neighbors at the mall or local sterile collection of chain retailers. That and
the growing-more-every-day choice - staying home, shopping on Amazon and
refraining from any contact with the outside world Ð have rendered Main Street
obsolete. The commercial viability of the small town ÔsquareÕ may be a thing of
the past (with the exception of the well-to-do communities where itÕs survived
by going super-upscale), but thereÕs something to be said not just for its obvious
charm but the idea of immersing oneself into the community by spending time
there. ItÕs safe to say nothingÕs truly replaced this.
THE BEATLES
Little needs to be said about this after
the recent 50th-anniversary blitz. Except that, it was very much like the current
generation of artists and media practitioners saying, we give up. No one or
nothing has, and perhaps ever will, replace them.
Hz So Good online (current issue and archive back to 2010) at http://www.60s70s.org/HzSoGood/.
Click.